South Africa and Hirschman’s ‘tunnel effect’ – possible signs of light?

540458614-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel-work-clothing-safety-suit-train-tunnelAlbert Hirschman’s ‘tunnel effect’ offers some compelling insight into the relative peace and stability which South Africa has enjoyed over the past quarter century – and also hints at where,  (in the spirit of Hirschman’s ongoing commitment to a  ‘passion for the possible’, hope might be found going forward. The tunnel effect is an especially evocative way of exploring the interaction between economics and psychology —  how development policy and practice interact with a society’s narratives about itself.

Of special salience for South Africa’s current moment are the insights in his article on “the changing tolerance for income inequality”. Though written in 1973, and part of an effort to understand Latin America’s disillusion of that time, his insights speak in a fresh and visceral way to South Africa’s contemporary reality. (You can find  a more comprehensive discussion of Hirschman’s ideas  in this related post.)  Here are three themes that seem especially relevant:

Tolerance for disparity. “It can happen that society’s tolerance for increasing disparities may initially [=post-1994…..] be substantial.  An individual’s welfare depends on his present state of contentment, as well as on his expected future contentment. Advances of others supply information about a more benign external environment; receipt of this information produces gratification; and this gratification overcomes, or at least suspends, envy.  As long as this tunnel effect lasts, everybody feels better off, both those who have become richer and those who have not. But this tolerance is like a credit that falls due at a certain date.  It is extended in the expectation that eventually the disparities will narrow again. If this does not occur, there is bound to be trouble and, perhaps, disaster.  Non-realization of the expectation that my turn will soon come will at some point result in my ‘becoming furious’ that is, in my turning into an enemy of the established order.  No particular outward event sets off this dramatic turnaround.”

Contested upward mobility: “The upwardly mobile do not necessarily turn into pillars of society all at once, but may on the contrary be disaffected and subversive for a considerable time. The principal reason for this surprising development is the phenomenon of partial and truncated mobility…. The upwardly mobile who may have risen along one of the dimensions of social status, such as wealth, find that a number of obstacles, rigidities and discriminatory practices still block their continued ascent, particularly along other dimensions, as well as their all-round acceptance by the traditional elites, and consequently they feel that in spite of all their efforts and achievements, they are not really ‘making it’. Only as social mobility continues for a long period, and the tradition system of stratification is substantially eroded as a result, will the upwardly mobile become fully integrated – or ‘co-opted’.”

Reversals. “In a second phase there may take place a symmetrical switch: the upwardly mobile become integrated, whereas  the nonmobile lose their earlier hope of joining the upward surge and turn into enemies of the existing order….It is quite unlikely however that the beginning of the second phase will coincide for the two groups….The nonmobile may experience the turnaround from hopefulness to disenchantment, while the mobile are still disaffected. This last situation clearly contains much potential for social upheaval.”

Superficially, the implications of the above might seem gloomy, but there’s also the possibility of a hopeful interpretation. The ‘tunnel effect’  framework suggests that society’s problems don’t have to be ‘solved’ to provide a platform for progress. Rather, what is needed is a credible narrative that can kindle hope.  For two decades, South Africa’s democratic ‘miracle’ and the African National Congress’s promise of ‘a better life for all’ provided the requisite platform. But the weakness of that platform’s foundations have become all too evident.  Anger or hope, which is it to be?  How can a new sense of possibility be rekindled?

5 responses

  1. Pingback: The Idea of Inclusion and its Resilience « WORKING WITH THE GRAIN: Integrating governance and growth

  2. And similar is true of the US and perhaps UK. A view of progress for all up to the 90s kept everyone more or less satisfied. But the fact that inequality has soared and a feeling that social mobility is dropping is leading to the current move to Trump and Brexit.

    In South Africa resumption of growth and a rekindling of hope and perhaps a social compact with business under Ramaphosa can bring us to a positive trajectory if real benefits start to accrue for the poorest (eg national minimum wage), the middle class (through growth) and the black upperclass feel that their political power is translating into economic power.

  3. Pingback: A thriving, inclusive South Africa – from vision to action « WORKING WITH THE GRAIN: Integrating governance and growth

  4. Pingback: South Africa’s challenge: Defusing the inequality-institutions time bomb « WORKING WITH THE GRAIN: Integrating governance and growth

  5. Pingback: On hope, inclusion and Hirschman’s tunnel effect « WORKING WITH THE GRAIN: Integrating governance and growth

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s