Book abstract

“Best practices” prescriptions for reform have long dominated the development discourse, but they are not a useful way of responding to the governance ambiguities of the early 21st century. Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies draws on both innovative scholarship and the author’s quarter century experience at the World Bank to lay out an alternative — a practical, analytically grounded, “with-the-grain” approach to addressing the twin development challenges of reducing poverty and weaknesses in governance.

Best practice prescriptions confuse the goals of development with the journey of getting from here to there. A strong rule of law, capable and accountable governments, a flexible ‘level-playing-field’ business environment are indeed desirable end points. But the ability to describe well-governed states does not conjure them into existence. If the only available actions are ‘all’ or ‘nothing’, then efforts at change will almost certainly fall short, leading to disillusion and despair.

By contrast, Working with the Grain takes as its point of departure the realities of a country’s economy, polity and society, and directs attention towards the challenges of initiating and sustaining forward development momentum. The book:

  • Distinguishes among four broad groups of countries, according to whether polities are dominant or competitive, and whether
    institutions are personalized or impersonal.
  •  Identifies alternative options for governance and policy reform — “top down” options which endeavor to strengthen formal
    institutions, and options supporting the emergence of “islands of effectiveness.”
  •  Explores how to identify entry points for change where there is a “good fit” between divergent country contexts and
    alternative options for reform.

Sometimes the binding constraint to forward movement can be institutional, making governance reform the priority; at other times, the priority can better be on inclusive growth. Taking the decade-or-so time horizon of practitioners, the aim is to nudge things along — seeking gains that initially may seem quite modest but can, sometimes, give rise to a cascading sequence of change for the better.

2 responses

  1. Pingback: Learning to grapple with corruption as a systemic problem |

  2. Pingback: Learning to grapple with corruption as a systemic problem | Global Integrity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s